Comments for Of Ones and Zeros http://www.ofonesandzeros.com a discussion of software and technology hosted by bryan napier Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:06:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 Comment on Office Picture Manager won’t open after clicking "Upload Multiple" in Picture Library by bryan http://www.ofonesandzeros.com/2009/03/19/office-picture-manager-wont-open-after-clicking-upload-multiple-in-picture-library/comment-page-1/#comment-212 bryan Wed, 30 Jun 2010 11:06:00 +0000 http://blog.ofonesandzeros.com/2009/03/19/office-picture-manager-wont-open-after-clicking-upload-multiple-in-picture-library/#comment-212 Unfortunately I haven't run across this for sp2010 yet. If/when I do I will be sure to update this post. Unfortunately I haven’t run across this for sp2010 yet. If/when I do I will be sure to update this post.

]]> Comment on Office Picture Manager won’t open after clicking "Upload Multiple" in Picture Library by abney317 http://www.ofonesandzeros.com/2009/03/19/office-picture-manager-wont-open-after-clicking-upload-multiple-in-picture-library/comment-page-1/#comment-211 abney317 Tue, 29 Jun 2010 21:01:33 +0000 http://blog.ofonesandzeros.com/2009/03/19/office-picture-manager-wont-open-after-clicking-upload-multiple-in-picture-library/#comment-211 any ideas on this problem for sharepoint 2010? any ideas on this problem for sharepoint 2010?

]]> Comment on "The page you are attempting to save has been modified by another user since you began editing" by Girdhari Rawal http://www.ofonesandzeros.com/2007/12/17/the-page-you-are-attempting-to-save-has-been-modified-by-another-user-since-you-began-editing/comment-page-1/#comment-210 Girdhari Rawal Fri, 14 May 2010 06:25:12 +0000 http://blog.ofonesandzeros.com/2007/12/17/the-page-you-are-attempting-to-save-has-been-modified-by-another-user-since-you-began-editing/#comment-210 Hello Bryan Napier, This post helped me to solve issue. thanks, Hello Bryan Napier,

This post helped me to solve issue.
thanks,

]]> Comment on “Object reference not set to an instance of an object” executing STSADM commands by sacchit http://www.ofonesandzeros.com/2009/08/24/object-reference-not-set-to-an-instance-of-an-object-executing-stsadm-commands/comment-page-1/#comment-91 sacchit Tue, 02 Feb 2010 09:47:20 +0000 http://www.ofonesandzeros.com/2009/08/24/object-reference-not-set-to-an-instance-of-an-object-executing-stsadm-commands/#comment-91 thank you that saved some time thank you that saved some time

]]> Comment on "The security validation for this page is invalid" by Lee Carter http://www.ofonesandzeros.com/2008/11/18/the-security-validation-for-this-page-is-invalid/comment-page-1/#comment-79 Lee Carter Mon, 16 Nov 2009 19:38:07 +0000 http://blog.ofonesandzeros.com/2008/11/18/the-security-validation-for-this-page-is-invalid/#comment-79 Thank you for posting this - this issue has had me stumped for two days. I just modified my code to set AllowUnsafeUpdates to true after calling BreakRoleInheritance() and, like magic, no more dreaded "security validation" errors. Thanks again. Thank you for posting this – this issue has had me stumped for two days. I just modified my code to set AllowUnsafeUpdates to true after calling BreakRoleInheritance() and, like magic, no more dreaded “security validation” errors. Thanks again.

]]> Comment on "The security validation for this page is invalid" by bryan http://www.ofonesandzeros.com/2008/11/18/the-security-validation-for-this-page-is-invalid/comment-page-1/#comment-70 bryan Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:48:27 +0000 http://blog.ofonesandzeros.com/2008/11/18/the-security-validation-for-this-page-is-invalid/#comment-70 I'm glad the information was useful to you! I’m glad the information was useful to you!

]]> Comment on "The security validation for this page is invalid" by chris http://www.ofonesandzeros.com/2008/11/18/the-security-validation-for-this-page-is-invalid/comment-page-1/#comment-69 chris Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:31:45 +0000 http://blog.ofonesandzeros.com/2008/11/18/the-security-validation-for-this-page-is-invalid/#comment-69 Holy cow thanks for this post. I've been racking my brain for days trying to figure out why I kept getting the "AllowUnsafeUpdates" error. Holy cow thanks for this post. I’ve been racking my brain for days trying to figure out why I kept getting the “AllowUnsafeUpdates” error.

]]> Comment on "The security validation for this page is invalid" by chris http://www.ofonesandzeros.com/2008/11/18/the-security-validation-for-this-page-is-invalid/comment-page-1/#comment-68 chris Thu, 23 Jul 2009 14:30:07 +0000 http://blog.ofonesandzeros.com/2008/11/18/the-security-validation-for-this-page-is-invalid/#comment-68 Type your comment here... Type your comment here…

]]> Comment on Subversion "Shelving" by bryan http://www.ofonesandzeros.com/2009/01/07/subversion-shelving/comment-page-1/#comment-67 bryan Tue, 21 Jul 2009 14:11:56 +0000 http://blog.ofonesandzeros.com/2009/01/07/subversion-shelving/#comment-67 I suppose the "clumsiness" is relative to your general subversion experience. Branching/merging in Subversion is widely regarded as a somewhat unkempt process. TortoiseSVN definitely does its part to simplify the process, but is it as straight-forward as TFS? Nope. As to whether shelving is branching or not, I would argue that it is very similar, if not identical, to the concept of private branches. The difference is more semantic than functional. Similar to how tags are handled in Subversion. At the end of the day you are in effect creating a branch, but because it is within the tag parent, the semantic is that it should be read-only. With shelves in this context, yes, it is a branch, but because the branch is within /shelf the semantic dictates that it is intended to be a "parking lot" for code for an indeterminate period of time, not a traditional branch that would have additional commits. Great comments Galaxis, thanks. I suppose the “clumsiness” is relative to your general subversion experience. Branching/merging in Subversion is widely regarded as a somewhat unkempt process. TortoiseSVN definitely does its part to simplify the process, but is it as straight-forward as TFS? Nope.

As to whether shelving is branching or not, I would argue that it is very similar, if not identical, to the concept of private branches. The difference is more semantic than functional. Similar to how tags are handled in Subversion. At the end of the day you are in effect creating a branch, but because it is within the tag parent, the semantic is that it should be read-only. With shelves in this context, yes, it is a branch, but because the branch is within /shelf the semantic dictates that it is intended to be a “parking lot” for code for an indeterminate period of time, not a traditional branch that would have additional commits.

Great comments Galaxis, thanks.

]]> Comment on Subversion "Shelving" by Galaxis http://www.ofonesandzeros.com/2009/01/07/subversion-shelving/comment-page-1/#comment-66 Galaxis Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:58:42 +0000 http://blog.ofonesandzeros.com/2009/01/07/subversion-shelving/#comment-66 Actually Shelving is not Branchcing; only part of the equation. Don't forget about the merge back! THis process is clumsy and error-prone (as you'll see from the article you link to) especially after using TFS. Subversion has a ways to go, but TFS is relatively new and MS never rests on its laurels, so the for a while, the gap (and TFS's adoption) will probably widen. Actually Shelving is not Branchcing; only part of the equation. Don’t forget about the merge back! THis process is clumsy and error-prone (as you’ll see from the article you link to) especially after using TFS. Subversion has a ways to go, but TFS is relatively new and MS never rests on its laurels, so the for a while, the gap (and TFS’s adoption) will probably widen.

]]>